<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>jalinski.org</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jalinski.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jalinski.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 20:19:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Josh has been named a finalist for Advisor of the Year!</title>
		<link>http://jalinski.org/uncategorized/josh-has-been-named-one-of-the-top-five-financial-advisors-in-the-country/</link>
		<comments>http://jalinski.org/uncategorized/josh-has-been-named-one-of-the-top-five-financial-advisors-in-the-country/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 02:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jalinski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jalinski.org/?p=232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am truly honored to be named as one of only 5 finalists for the Senior Market Advisor of The Year by Senior Market Advisor magazine.  "While there’s been talk that the financial advisory industry is aging, just like the rest of the country, there are more than a few young advisors joining the ranks and helping to keep the business dynamic and cutting edge. Josh Jalinski is one of the most motivated of that new wave of advisors..." 
Click "Continue Reading" to see the full story.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Centennial, CO, August 6, 2010—Senior Market Advisor, one of the leading monthly business publication for advisors and producers serving the senior market, announced that Josh Jalinski is a finalist for its 2010 Advisor of the Year Award.</p>
<p>&#8220;We strive to celebrate the independent advisor and I believe we have done a great job of that this year with the five finalists,&#8221; said Daniel Williams, editor of Senior Market Advisor.&#8221;All of these finalists are terrific producers, who also uphold high ethical standards and have an innate ability to understand their client&#8217;s greatest needs.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;While there’s been talk that the financial advisory industry is aging, just like the rest of the country, there are more than a few young advisors joining the ranks and helping to keep the business dynamic and cutting edge. Josh Jalinski is one of the most motivated of that new wave of advisors.</p>
<p>And while Jalinski says hosting a sometimes politically charged radio show is a great innovation, it’s the relations he has with his clients that helps set him apart. That and his unstoppable work ethic.</p>
<p>“I grew up in the middle of the Jersey Shore, which is a hotbed of retirees, and I started working as a lifeguard when I was 14—and that’s when I noticed I seemed to relate more to the 70-plus generation than to my own, or even to boomers like my parents,” Jalinski says. “I was kind of like this Alex P. Keaton-type kid with a lifelong Democrat grandmother who lived with us.”</p>
<div id="bodyAd"><script src="http://oascentral.nationalunderwriter.com/RealMedia/ads/adstream_jx.ads/www.seniormarket.com/marketconduct/Issues/2010/August-2010/Pages/The-Finalists-2010-Advisor-of-the-Year.aspx/112010822144@!" type="text/javascript"></script><noscript></noscript></div>
<p><strong>Off to an early start</strong><br />
Jalinski’s father was a banker and Jalinski followed suit, starting at OceanFirst Bank when he was just 18. He took both a Bachelor’s degree in rhetoric and a Master’s in Divinity (“I can strike up a conversation with anyone, at any time,” he notes), married at 21 and began taking his first steps as an advisor.</p>
<p>Jalinski says that his move was his decision to start <a href="http://www.seniormarketadvisor.com/Issues/2009/December/Pages/Master-the-Local-Media.aspx?k=radio+show"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">hosting a radio show </span></a>on WOBM, a popular AM station best known for playing Sinatra and the standards. He says he’s able to use the show (which now airs daily) to develop interest in financial planning.</p>
<p>He’s also not shy to include a lot of his conservative-leaning ideas in the discussions on his show. “It’s sort of the Fox News approach to financial planning,” he laughs. “I do get the most response when I’m overt about it. I just don’t bring those kind of discussions into my seminars or my talks with clients.”</p>
<p><strong>Hard work</strong><br />
And just what is the secret to a million-dollar year, when many of his contemporaries are working at Starbucks or living in their parents’ basements? Hard work is crucial, he says, as well as covering all of his bases with a full suite of designations, including the Series 6, 7, 24 and 66 and various insurance licenses.</p>
<p>“I’m like a machine sometimes we do 30 appointments a week, but that’s the way to do it. I would so much rather help someone with just $100,000 to his name—that alone is sort of like a financial ministry to people. And if you do 30 meetings a week, success just becomes a numbers game.”</p>
<p>**In the interest of full disclosure: A record number of nominees were evaluated by the editorial staff of Senior Market Advisor based on the following criteria:</p>
<p>1.)Have a minimum of five consecutive current years as an advisor</p>
<p>2.) Have garnered a minimum of $5 million in annuity/life insurance premium in PERSONAL production during 2009; or have sold a minimum of $400,000 in Long Term Care Insurance premium in PERSONAL production during 2009</p>
<p>3.)Clear a 7-year background check for civil, criminal and business violations by the National Ethics Bureau (for complete details about the background check, visit <a href="http://www.ethicscheck.com">www.ethicscheck.com</a>)</p>
<p>4.)Have an average client age of 60 or older</p>
<p>5.)Be able to demonstrate a commitment to community involvement</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jalinski.org/uncategorized/josh-has-been-named-one-of-the-top-five-financial-advisors-in-the-country/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I was looking forward to buying an electric car&#8230;.</title>
		<link>http://jalinski.org/uncategorized/i-was-looking-forward-to-buying-an-electric-car/</link>
		<comments>http://jalinski.org/uncategorized/i-was-looking-forward-to-buying-an-electric-car/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 02:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jalinski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chevy Volt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electric car]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GM bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[too expensive]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jalinski.org/?p=226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Then, I found out that it is unproven technology, expensive, and ugly.  Couldn't we have gotten a better return on our bailout of GM than this? 

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="content-header">
<h1>Dissing the Volt</h1>
</div>
<p><!-- /#content-header --></p>
<div id="content-area-block">
<div id="node-71131">
<div>
<div>
<div id="node-header-block">
<div id="node-header-data-header-data-secondary">
<p>— By <a href="http://motherjones.com/authors/kevin-drum">Kevin Drum</a></p>
<div id="dateline">| Fri Jul. 30, 2010 9:54 AM PDT</div>
</div>
</div>
<div id="node-body-top-block">
<p>Edward Niedermeyer <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/30/opinion/30neidermeyer.html?_r=1&amp;ref=opinion" target="_blank">goes to town on the Chevy Volt:</a></p>
<blockquote><p>For starters, G.M.’s vision turned into a car that costs $41,000 before relevant tax breaks &#8230; but after billions of dollars of government loans and grants for the Volt’s development and production. And instead of the sleek coupe of 2007, it looks suspiciously similar to a Toyota Prius. It also requires premium gasoline, seats only four people (the battery runs down the center of the car, preventing a rear bench) and has less head and leg room than the $17,000 Chevrolet Cruze, which is more or less the non-electric version of the Volt.</p></blockquote>
<p>This is actually not as bad as I feared when <a href="http://twitter.com/jackshafer/status/19921579192" target="_blank">Jack Shafer</a> pointed me toward Niedermeyer&#8217;s blast. Looks like a Prius? Meh. Requires premium gasoline? The whole point is that it doesn&#8217;t use much gasoline in the first place (no one buys a Volt if they do a lot of long-distance driving), so meh again. Seats four people? That&#8217;s a drawback, but not a big one for most people. And although headroom and legroom are indeed a bit less than the Cruze, reviewers mostly seem to think it&#8217;s pretty adequate.</p>
<p>That leaves that $41,000 price tag. Which comes down to maybe $34,000 after the federal rebate and perhaps a bit less if your state also offers a rebate. Either way, it&#8217;s still a whole lot more than $17,000, and you&#8217;re not going to come close to making that up in fuel costs no matter how long you keep the thing. The rest of the Volt&#8217;s drawbacks may be modest (and you can add limited trunk space to Niedermeyer&#8217;s list), but they seem a lot worse when you&#8217;re paying 15 grand for the privilege of suffering through them.</p>
<p>Not to worry, though. In the software biz we always say that nothing is ever right until v3.0. So by 2018 or so the Volt should be in good shape. Assuming that General Motors still exists by then, of course.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jalinski.org/uncategorized/i-was-looking-forward-to-buying-an-electric-car/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>leave your money to the people you love NOT Uncle Sam</title>
		<link>http://jalinski.org/uncategorized/leave-your-money-to-the-people-you-love-not-uncle-sam/</link>
		<comments>http://jalinski.org/uncategorized/leave-your-money-to-the-people-you-love-not-uncle-sam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 07:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh Jalinski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lower Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[More Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[estate planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inheritance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaving money to spouse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jalinski.org/?p=22</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That's me with my gorgeous wife, Bethie.  I put this pic up to remind you to use vehicles in your retirement that will enable you to leave your money to the people you love and the causes you love -- not to Uncle Sam.  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://jalinski.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/bethie-and-josh.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-68" title="bethie and josh" src="http://jalinski.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/bethie-and-josh-300x249.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="249" /></a>That&#8217;s me with my gorgeous wife, Bethie.  I put this pic up to remind you to use vehicles in your retirement that will enable you to leave your money to the people you love and the causes you love &#8212; not to Uncle Sam.  One of the best ways to leave tax-free income to your wife is through life insurance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jalinski.org/uncategorized/leave-your-money-to-the-people-you-love-not-uncle-sam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>can I gift bonds to charity and not pay tax?</title>
		<link>http://jalinski.org/uncategorized/can-i-gift-bonds-to-charity-and-not-pay-tax/</link>
		<comments>http://jalinski.org/uncategorized/can-i-gift-bonds-to-charity-and-not-pay-tax/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 08:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jalinski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lower Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gift]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planned giving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[savings bonds]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jalinski.org/?p=144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I got a good question from a prospective client today and I thought I would share it with my blog: Can you gift bonds to charity and not pay tax on the interest?  Click below to find out the answer.  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently you can&#8217;t gift bonds after all.</p>
<p>The ironic thing is that you would think you could, because current law allows a donor to gift stick to charity and not pay capital gains. So, this may be a reason why you may not want to buy and hold long term savings bonds. </p>
<p>Page 4 of <a href="http://www.treasurydirect.gov/instit/savbond/guide/bondtell/bondtell_0500.pdf">http://www.treasurydirect.gov/instit/savbond/guide/bondtell/bondtell_0500.pdf</a></p>
<p>Also see the Treasury regulations at <a href="http://www.treasurydirect.gov/forms/savdc3-80.pdf">http://www.treasurydirect.gov/forms/savdc3-80.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jalinski.org/uncategorized/can-i-gift-bonds-to-charity-and-not-pay-tax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guess this celebrity!</title>
		<link>http://jalinski.org/uncategorized/hello-world/</link>
		<comments>http://jalinski.org/uncategorized/hello-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 12:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh Jalinski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Less Risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lower Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[More Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[failures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trusts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wills]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jalinski.org/?p=1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Guess this celebrity! He was 42 when died on August 16, 1977 from a drug overdose in Memphis TN.  He wanted to leave most of his money to his daughter, but Uncle Sam took over 73% of his estate in taxes.  Who is this Celebrity?  Elvis Presley.  If you would like your loved ones to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guess this celebrity! He was 42 when died on August 16, 1977 from a drug overdose in Memphis TN.  He wanted to leave most of his money to his daughter, but Uncle Sam took over 73% of his estate in taxes.  Who is this Celebrity?  Elvis Presley.  If you would like your loved ones to inherit your savings and not Uncle Sam, click on this link for the full story about interesting estate planning failures of famous celebrities: <a href="http://back9ins.com/Marketing/Estate%20Planning%20Failures.pdf">http://back9ins.com/Marketing/Estate%20Planning%20Failures.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jalinski.org/uncategorized/hello-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Check us out on www.ethicscheck.com</title>
		<link>http://jalinski.org/uncategorized/check-us-out-on-www-ethicscheck-com/</link>
		<comments>http://jalinski.org/uncategorized/check-us-out-on-www-ethicscheck-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 16:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jalinski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Less Risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethicscheck.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[how to check out your financial advisor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[how to see if your financial advisor is a crook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Ethics Bureau]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jalinski.org/?p=192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How can you Madoff-proof your investments? 

Well, for one, make sure your financial advisor has been verified with www.ethicscheck.com.  They have done a seven year investigation of the Jalinski Advisory Group, my financial firm. 

The National Ethics Bureau (NEB) .... 
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can you Madoff-proof your investments? </p>
<p>Well, for one, make sure your financial advisor has been verified with <a href="http://www.ethicscheck.com">www.ethicscheck.com</a>.  They have done a seven year investigation of the Jalinski Advisory Group, my financial firm. </p>
<p>The National Ethics Bureau (NEB) is an organization that provides services similar to the Better Business Bureau (BBB). However, NEB has an extensive nationwide background check process designed specifically for financial professionals. (See <a onclick="return popitup('advisors/neb_bbb.html')" href="advisors/neb_bbb.html">NEB Qualifications Check List</a>).</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.ethicscheck.com/about/mission.htm"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">mission</span></a> of the National Ethics Bureau is to promote ethics in the financial services industry.   They do this in three ways:</p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="3" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="4%" valign="top"><strong>1.</strong></td>
<td width="96%" valign="top"><strong>By providing comprehensive background checks on financial professionals.</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong>2.</strong></td>
<td valign="top"><strong>By providing ethics and compliance education and motivation for industry professionals.</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong>3.</strong></td>
<td valign="top"><strong>By maintaining a comprehensive resource directory of state and federal regulators and consumer protection agencies.</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>So, bottom line: make sure your financial advisor is verified by ethicscheck.com like we are!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jalinski.org/uncategorized/check-us-out-on-www-ethicscheck-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lebron James Tax Holiday?</title>
		<link>http://jalinski.org/uncategorized/lebron-james-tax-holiday/</link>
		<comments>http://jalinski.org/uncategorized/lebron-james-tax-holiday/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 01:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jalinski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704075604575357232023445918.html?mod=WSJ_article_MoreIn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lebron James tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lebron James tax holiday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lebron James taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lebron leaving Ohio for better tax situation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lebron tax holiday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lebronomics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jalinski.org/?p=186</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is Lebron James leaving the Cleveland Cavaliers, in part, due to higher taxes? I, Josh Jalinski, The Financial Quarterback, will be exploring the link between finance and sports on 92.7 WOBM FM this Sunday at 6AM!  Be sure to catch us every Sunday morning at 6AM.  Click the link below to read more about how Lebron James is saving 12.85 million dollars in state income taxes alone.  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the Wall Street Journal: &#8220;We come not to praise or bury LeBron James, but only to note that by moving to Miami he&#8217;s going to save a bundle on taxes. We&#8217;ll take the King of ESPN&#8217;s word that he&#8217;s jumping to the Miami Heat from the Cleveland Cavaliers mainly for basketball reasons, but it is also true that Florida has no income tax. The rate in Akron, Ohio is a little over 7%.&#8221;</p>
<p>Click on this link for more of the story: <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704075604575357232023445918.html?mod=WSJ_newsreel_opinion">http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704075604575357232023445918.html?mod=WSJ_newsreel_opinion</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jalinski.org/uncategorized/lebron-james-tax-holiday/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wall Streets Biggest Bears</title>
		<link>http://jalinski.org/uncategorized/wall-streets-biggest-bears/</link>
		<comments>http://jalinski.org/uncategorized/wall-streets-biggest-bears/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 08:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jalinski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Less Risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bears]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Rosenberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Faber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pessimists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roubini]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jalinski.org/?p=138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article by Forbes tells you some of the economists that we follow on a regular basis at the Jalinski Advisory Group.  NOTE: they are all pessimistic about the future state of the economy.  They are also NOT financial advisors.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Wall Street&#8217;s Biggest Bears</strong><br />
Nathan Vardi, 06.08.10, 6:00 PM ET</p>
<p>They are the pessimists, worrywarts and naysayers of today&#8217;s turbulent markets. These are the guys who appear on CNBC peddling gloom and worry. They represent fear.</p>
<p>The U.S. stock market is already down more than 5% this year and more than 10% since its April peak, as measured by the S&amp;P 500. The biggest bears of the financial markets are concerned about different things: inflation, deflation, government debt, tax hikes, insufficient government stimulus, government intervention or lack of regulation. What they all have in common is they think we are in for some tough sledding.</p>
<p> David Rosenberg is a big bear. He is the chief economist and strategist at investment firm Gluskin Sheff and used to be chief North American economist at Merrill Lynch. He thinks the U.S. stock market is headed much lower&#8230;. He is chiefly concerned about global government debt problems and believes it will take years for the world to cleanse itself through what will be a long period of deleveraging filled with unexpected events.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.forbes.com/2010/06/08/roubini-faber-laffer-business-wall-street-biggest-bears_slide.html">In Pictures: Wall Street&#8217;s Biggest Bears</a></strong></p>
<p> The global economy and stock market returns are, according to Mohamed El-Erian, simply mired in a &#8220;new normal.&#8221; The chief executive of bond giant Pacific Investment Management Co. says stocks will achieve below-average returns and the U.S. economy will be characterized by slow growth, high unemployment and incessant government meddling.</p>
<p>&#8220;Our problems aren&#8217;t over. Our bear market is not over. These problems are going to come back to haunt us and to hurt us, either this year, next year, the year after&#8211;sometime in the foreseeable future,&#8221; said Jim Rogers recently. The American investor and cofounder of the Quantum Fund has been critical of government spending and intervention in the markets and predicts it will lead to serious inflationary problems. He advocates that people put their money in real assets ranging from cotton to natural gas, because currencies backed by government are being debased.</p>
<p>&#8220;I am very bearish on everything,&#8221; Marc Faber recently told Bloomberg News. The investment analyst and newsletter writer thinks disaster is here because of government intervention in the markets and looming inflation. Faber is convinced governments will tax and regulate the private sector to death.</p>
<p>Economist Arthur Laffer says the Bush tax cuts&#8217; expiriation in 2011 will result in &#8220;our worst nightmare of a severe &#8216;double dip&#8217; recession.&#8221; His call: When federal tax rates on income, dividend and capital gains rise in January &#8220;the train goes off the tracks.&#8221; Tax receipts will crash because people have been timing the recognition of their income in 2010. &#8220;The economy will collapse in 2011,&#8221; says Laffer.</p>
<p>Money manager John Hussman says another financial crisis is being caused by bad fiscal and monetary policy. &#8220;It is a delusion to interpret economic statistics suggesting an economic turnaround over the past year without factoring out the extent to which that has been driven by unsustainable levels of deficit spending,&#8221; says Hussman. Newsletter writer Richard Russell says things like, &#8220;Do your friends a favor. Tell them to &#8216;batten down the hatches&#8217;, because there&#8217;s a HARD RAIN coming.&#8221;</p>
<p>The bears are growling, and sometimes their predictions can be very specific. David Hefty, chief of Cornerstone Wealth Management, says the benchmark Dow Jones industrial average could tumble below 5,000. Economic forecaster David Levy pegs the chances of a new global recession starting within a year or so at around 60%.</p>
<p> Then there is Dr. Doom himself. Nouriel Roubini, an economist and Forbes contributor, predicted the global financial crisis. Now he thinks there is an increasing risk the stock market will fall sharply, and that industrialized economies will continue to face serious constraints, like high unemployment and over-indebtedness.</p>
<p> &#8221;History would suggest that maybe this crisis is not really over,&#8221; Roubini told Bloomberg News in May. &#8220;We just finished the first stage, and there&#8217;s a risk of ending up in the second stage of this financial crisis.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jalinski.org/uncategorized/wall-streets-biggest-bears/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Weiss ratings are back ~ what does that mean to you?</title>
		<link>http://jalinski.org/uncategorized/weiss-ratings-are-back-what-does-that-mean-to-you/</link>
		<comments>http://jalinski.org/uncategorized/weiss-ratings-are-back-what-does-that-mean-to-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 19:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jalinski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[is my bank safe?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[is my insurance company safe?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Weiss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thestreet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weiss ratings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jalinski.org/?p=122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Weiss Ratings Resumes Role as Nation’s Leading Independent Rating Agency of Financial Institutions ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weiss bought Back Bank and Insurance Ratings from TheStreet.com.  This means that there is once again an unbiased guide to see if your bank or financial insitution is as strong as you think it is! -  Josh Jalinski  </p>
<p><strong>Weiss Ratings Resumes Role as Nation’s Leading<br />
Independent Rating Agency of Financial Institutions </strong></p>
<p>Jupiter, Florida, May 6, 2010 — Weiss Group, LLC, a leading provider of independent research and ratings since 1971, has announced today that it has bought back the bank and insurance company ratings which it had sold to TheStreet in 2006, restoring the business to its wholly owned subsidiary, Weiss Ratings.</p>
<p>Unlike most other rating agencies, Weiss Ratings accepts no compensation of any kind from the companies it rates, deriving its revenues exclusively from the sale of ratings and data to consumers and others via public libraries and the Internet.</p>
<p>In addition to its independent ratings on the nation’s banks and insurers, Weiss has also entered into a licensing agreement with TheStreet to resume distribution of independent ratings on publicly traded companies, mutual funds, closed end funds and exchange-traded funds (ETFs). At the same time, TheStreet has licensed Weiss’ bank and insurance company ratings to distribute to its customers.</p>
<p>“I believe the timing of this change couldn’t be better,” commented Martin D. Weiss, Ph.D., chairman and founder of Weiss Ratings. “It comes at a time when financial institutions continue failing at an alarming pace and when new evidence of conflicts at established rating agencies underscores the consumer’s urgent need for unbiased ratings to help protect them.”</p>
<p>Weiss continued: “Also with this change, Weiss Ratings analysts can focus mostly on research that helps safeguard bank depositors and insurance policyholders, while TheStreet analysts can focus primarily on publicly traded companies bought and sold by investors.”</p>
<p>Weiss Ratings has hired back its former bank and insurance analysts and staff, who will continue at their current location in the Weiss Group headquarters in Jupiter, Florida. “TheStreet has done an excellent job of maintaining Weiss’ tradition of independence and accuracy. As the name on the door changes back to Weiss Ratings, we won’t miss a beat. Most important, consumers can rest assured that their financial safety will always be our primary mission.”</p>
<p>*****</p>
<p>Weiss Ratings is the nation’s only provider of independent ratings on the nation’s 900 life and annuity insurers, 2,700 property and casualty insurers, as well as 600 health insurers and HMOs. It is among the nation’s leading providers of independent ratings on 8,000 banks and S&amp;Ls. Plus, it also distributes independent ratings on the shares of thousands of publicly traded companies, mutual funds, closed-end funds and ETFs.</p>
<p>By adhering to its independent business model, Weiss outperformed Standard and Poor’s, Moody’s, A.M. Best and Duff &amp; Phelps (now Fitch) in warning of future life and health insurance company failures according to <a href="http://archive.gao.gov/t2pbat2/152669.pdf" target="_blank">a 1994 study by the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO)</a>, while also outperforming its competitors in identifying the safest insurers, according to its follow-up study using the GAO’s research methodology. Similarly, Weiss was the only one to identify, in advance, nearly all major banks that failed or required a federal bailout in the 2008-2009 debt crisis. (See <a href="http://blogs.moneyandmarkets.com/martin-weiss/the-only-ones-who-warned-ahead-of-time">Weiss Warnings of Financial Failures in Debt Crisis of 2008-2009</a>.)</p>
<p>In the field of stock ratings, Weiss outperformed J.P. Morgan Chase, Merrill Lynch, Goldman Sachs, Piper Jaffray, Credit Suisse First Boston, Smith Barney, Standard and Poor’s, and Morgan Stanley, plus all 14 of the other broker-operated and independent research firms reviewed by Investars.com and published in the <em>Wall Street Journal</em> in June of 2005.</p>
<p>Thanks to its strong track record and independence, <em>The</em> <em>New York Times</em> wrote that Weiss was “the first to see the dangers and say so unambiguously”; <em>Barron’s</em> wrote that Weiss is “the leader in identifying vulnerable companies;” and <em>Esquire</em> concluded that Weiss Ratings is “the one company [that] … provides financial grades free of any conflicts of interest.”</p>
<p>Click on this link for more info: <a href="http://www.moneyandmarkets.com/weiss-buys-back-bank-and-insurance-ratings-from-thestreet-com-39001">http://www.moneyandmarkets.com/weiss-buys-back-bank-and-insurance-ratings-from-thestreet-com-39001</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jalinski.org/uncategorized/weiss-ratings-are-back-what-does-that-mean-to-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>47% of Americans pay no taxes</title>
		<link>http://jalinski.org/uncategorized/47-pay-no-taxes/</link>
		<comments>http://jalinski.org/uncategorized/47-pay-no-taxes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 13:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh Jalinski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lower Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[47%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[47% pay no taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[47% pay not taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/JalinskiAdvisoryGroup/?p=13</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I believe that all these articles on people paying no federal income tax is a ploy by many to institute the VAT tax.  Beware ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="47% pay no taxes" href="http://http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/14/business/economy/14leonhardt.html?ref=business" target="_blank">Yes, 47% of Households Owe No Taxes. Look Closer. </a></p>
<h6>By DAVID LEONHARDT</h6>
<h6>Published: April 13, 2010</h6>
<div id="Frame4A">Forty-seven percent.</div>
<div><!--h--></div>
<div>
<div><a href="javascript:pop_me_up2('http://www.nytimes.com/imagepages/2010/04/14/business/14leonhardt_CA0.html','14leonhardt_CA0_html','width=720,height=563,scrollbars=yes,toolbars=no,resizable=yes')"><img src="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2010/04/14/business/14leonhardt_CA0/14leonhardt_CA0-articleInline.jpg" alt="" width="190" height="127" /> </a></div>
<h6>Daniel Acker/Bloomberg News</h6>
<p>About three-quarters of households pay more in payroll taxes than in income taxes.</p>
</div>
<div id="readerscomment">That’s the portion of American households that owe no income tax for 2009. The number is up from 38 percent in 2007, and it has become a popular <a title="Discussion of the 47 percent figure." href="http://mediamatters.org/research/201004090030">talking point</a> on cable television and talk radio. With Tax Day coming on Thursday, 47 percent has become shorthand for the notion that the wealthy face a much higher tax burden than they once did while growing numbers of Americans are effectively on the dole.</div>
<div>Click on this link to get the rest of the story from the NY Times:</div>
<div><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/14/business/economy/14leonhardt.html?ref=business">http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/14/business/economy/14leonhardt.html?ref=business</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jalinski.org/uncategorized/47-pay-no-taxes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

